I'm on Twitter timeout for 12 hours -_-

I got put on Twitter timeout for calling Candice Owens a stupid bint and a cunt moron.

Candice Owens purports that Trump never incited violence on Jan 6 and Trump was banned from social media because he's... somehow popular around the world?... Yea, that's ridiculous.  I'll copy-paste her tweet.

Her tweet:

No matter how many times the Democrats say it, Donald Trump never once used language to incite violence. 

He was banned from social media because the support he has around the world is a threat to their establishment. 

Say the truth as loud and as often as they say the lie.

I responded with:

XDDD Tell that to all the Trumpers in lockup, ya stupid bint! What type of dumb c*nt moron is this willfully ignorant? Is it like a choice to ignore all the hateful things that fake-tan dotard says or are you being paid to be a shite liking, boot polishing, ignoramuses clown?

Now I've gotten away with such comments before in the past, but I have no idea why I got put on timeout for this one.  I'd have to imagine that either Owens or a right-wing nut reported my tweet as a hateful comment.

Well, that couldn't be further from the truth.

You see as Candace Owens was spouting lies to cover up another man's lies, I was merely presenting an objective truth in my observation.  She is a stupid bint for defending a man who is the epitome of corruption.  To defend that man, his incitement, and all his lies as relaying "truth" to the public... well, you'd have to be some sort of cunt moron to go along with such nonsense.

Being a moron is anybody's right to be by oneself, but to continue to spread the infection of stupidity throughout the masses by condoning a lie (that has been debunked time and time again) is a very cunt thing to do.

On top of that, by not condemning Trump's words of incitement and his inactions at the onset of Jan 6 are the actions of a shite licking, boot polishing, ignoramus crony.

To anyone with any sense and a moderate degree of rationality, they would observe these statements as an objective fact on full display.  So in fact none of my statements were hateful or harassing in any way.  I was merely stating an objective observation of her character based on her willingness to defend such a deplorable, corrupt, narcissist.

But, if it was indeed Candace Owens or a right-wing nutter who falsely reported my tweet, then perhaps they were incensed by my question of whether or not she was choosing to be willfully ignorant or being paid to do so.

I think it's a little bit of the former with a LOT of the latter.